The Yankees can no longer rely on Greg Bird
Ever
since the retirement of Mark Teixeira, first base has been a black hole for the
Yankees. Greg Bird’s emergence in 2015 made the Yankee universe optimistic for
the future at the position, but now going into his third injury-ridden season,
the Yankees cannot rely on him to be their first baseman for years to come.
Sure, the Yankees could sign another Chris Carter-like stop-gap like Mark
Reynolds to man the fort until Bird returns (hopefully), but at a certain point,
the Yankees have to move on. There is no denying the talent that Greg Bird
possesses and how much of lineup presence he provides when healthy, but if he
cannot stay on the field, his talent matters nothing.
Bird
was diagnosed on March 26 with a broken bone spur in his right ankle, the same
ankle that mysteriously kept him out for the majority of the 2017 season. Bird’s
surgery was successfully completed, and the road to recovery has begun. Bird’s
expected recovery time is 6-8 weeks, which projects him to return to the field
sometime in June. Depending on rehabilitation games in the minors, this
timetable could potentially be longer, but nevertheless, someone has to man the
first base position, while Bird is gone.
As
I mentioned in the first paragraph, there are a few veterans still without
teams that the Yankees could sign to a cheap contract to provide insurance at
the position. This is essentially what the Yankees did with Chris Carter last
offseason, and it was a fortunate thing they did, as Bird performed atrociously
in April and did not return to the Bronx until the late summer. However, this
solid signing quickly turned into a disaster as Carter became the most hated
player on the Yankees and was eventually released from the team.
After
Carter’s struggles, the Yankees gave Tyler Austin the opportunity to play the
position every day, but injuries to him resulted in that experiment also coming
to a fast halt. The Yankees then transitioned third baseman Chase Headley into
a first baseman where he played for a majority of the summer. This is essentially
what the Yankees would be doing with veteran infielder Neil Walker who
primarily has major league experience as a second and third baseman. While
Walker will provide a better bat than Headley and post similar defensive metrics,
he is not the answer long-term.
Bird
is supposed to be that answer to the hole left by Teixeira, but has yet to put
together even half of a full season on the field. So, rather than continuing to
transition a veteran infielder to a new corner position or signing stop-gaps
past their primes to fill the need, the Yankees need to look to the future as
if Greg Bird is not a part of their plans. This means one of two things: Sign
or trade for the first baseman of the future or develop someone internally.
With the possibility, Greg Bird can return from this surgery and be an
immediate force in the lineup, the chances of trading for the likes of a superstar
like Joey Votto are weaker than Bird’s ankle. So, that leaves the option of an
internal replacement.
Despite
the Yankees’ woes at the position, the depth for the position in the Yankees’
system is actually pretty strong. Greg Bird has been labeled as the best first
baseman in the system, but his best full-season is not substantially better or
in some cases worse than other first baseman or potential first baseman in the
Yankees’ system. Below is a table comparing Greg Bird’s most recent full season
to other internal first base candidates for the Yankees’ most recent full
season (Over 100 games played).
Player
|
G
|
XBHs
|
AVG
|
OBP
|
SLG
|
OPS
|
SB
|
Player
A
|
129
|
56
|
.272
|
.352
|
.488
|
.840
|
1
|
Player
B
|
130
|
56
|
.318
|
.357
|
.503
|
.860
|
6
|
Player
C
|
124
|
51
|
.277
|
.338
|
.483
|
.821
|
2
|
Player
D
|
138
|
60
|
.284
|
.376
|
.512
|
.888
|
7
|
Player
E
|
126
|
45
|
.270
|
.404
|
.471
|
.875
|
1
|
I
purposely left out the names of the players in order to prevent biases from differentiating
which player appears to be better out of the bunch. From this list, a few
players stick out to me: Player B was able to hit for the highest average, while
also slugging at a tremendous clip and being able to swipe a few bags, Player E
had a tremendous walk rate, while displaying sneaky power, and Player D was
all-around phenomenal. Now by assigning a point value to each statistical category
(excluding games played) from 1-5, with a 5 being the best in a category and a
1 being the worst, I was able to determine an overall “grade" for each player.
Here is how that turned out:
Player
|
Total
Points
|
Player
D
|
28
|
Player
B
|
23
|
Player
A
|
15
|
Player
E
|
14
|
Player
C
|
11
|
By
this methodology, Player D and Player B were clear favorites with Players A, E,
C at the bottom of the pack. Now, you are probably wondering what am I trying
to get at. Greg Bird has long been considered the prize jewel of the Yankees
farm system for the first base posisition. Because of this, players, such as, Tyler Austin were
forced to start the season at Triple-A, despite being more than capable of
manning an everyday job at the big league level. However, when you look at Greg
Bird’s most recent statistical outputs compared to his Yankee counterparts, he
does not stand out as much. Here is the same table displayed above, with the
names revealed.
Player
|
Total
Points
|
Tyler
Austin
|
28
|
Miguel
Andújar
|
23
|
Greg
Bird
|
15
|
Mike
Ford
|
14
|
Billy
McKinney
|
11
|
Tyler
Austin and Miguel Andújar, who is starting to learn first base, blow Bird out
of the water. Even Mike Ford, who the Yankees valued so little they let the
Mariners claim him in the Rule-5 draft, barely loses out to Bird. To add insult
to injury, Bird’s best production came all the way back in 2015, while the
other four players all have proven their skills in 2016 and 2017. I am not by any
means trying to say Bird is a bad player, or even an average player, but when
you boil it down to what these have actually proven they can do, Bird is no
better than Austin, Andujar, and even almost Mike Ford.
I
am quite aware that the stats don’t prove everything and that there are metrics
that go beyond the scorebook that cannot be represented, however, these
preconceived notions of players can lead to biases when trying to decide who is
the better overall player. If you asked any casual Yankee fan about why they
believe Greg Bird deserves to have first base “reserved” for him, you will
immediately hear Matt Vasgersian’s “Swing and a drive to right!” played on
repeat until you cannot smile any longer or about how his left-handed swing is
a perfect balance for this predominantly right-handed hitting powerhouse
lineup. Those are fine points to make, but the first observation is a thing of
the past and his swing, as beautiful as it is, is just a qualitative
characteristic that does not equate to any real value when comparing Bird to Austin or any of the other potential first baseman.
So,
I am about a thousand words and three tables deep in rants, but I have yet to propose
a solution to this whole dilemma. Here is what the Yankees need to do. At this
point it is a given that Tyler Austin will be called up for Thursday’s game in
Toronto and likely even start against the southpaw JA Happ. What isn’t a given
is how much playing time he will get over the next two months, considering the
rumor that Neil Walker and Austin may be a part of a lefty/righty platoon. I believe
it is in the Yankees’ best interest to eliminate this idea and let Austin or
another young prospect garner a majority of the at-bats at first base. This
sample size of approximately two months will provide Aaron Boone with an
adequate representation of how capable they are of manning the position, and if
they are doing well, Greg Bird should not be guaranteed his spot back as the
starting first baseman.
If
the calendar flips to June and Austin is posting an OPS above .840 (Bird’s best
when in the majors), while handing the glove well, then Greg Bird should have
to fight for his spot. Bird has proven next to nothing at the major league
level other than a few playoff home runs and a solid few months in 2015.
Yes, this is in all likelihood due to his injury history, but how can the
Yankees justify inserting a guy into the lineup every day that had an awful
spring training, has not hit well in the regular season in almost three years,
and is prone to injury? If Austin, Andújar or whoever they use as fill-ins at
first aren’t hitting, then yes Bird should get the opportunity to cement
himself in the lineup, but if they are hitting well, why does Bird get a free
pass?
The
reality is, Greg Bird appears to be out until June at the earliest. The Yankees
will likely call upon an internal first baseman to man the position until that
time rolls around. Based on the comparisons I displayed above, it has become
more obvious that Greg Bird is not as “special” as Yankee fans have made him
about to be. So, I believe the Yankees should proceed as if Greg Bird is not
coming back for the rest season and let the other young first baseman get a
chance to prove and cement themselves into the lineup. If Bird
returns and his replacement is hitting, then Bird should prepare to earn his
spot in the lineup and not be given it on a silver platter. The Yankees can no longer only rely on Greg Bird, and need to let their other first basemen play their hearts out.
Side
Note: I did not mention defense and here’s why. If the Yankees really cared a
ton about defense, they would not be attempting to convert two solid minor
league bats in their system, McKinney and Andujar, into first basemen.
Article
by: Ryan Thoms
Follow @RyanThoms_
Follow @BronxBomberBall
Bird has put up those numbers in the majors, the others at AAA. Big difference.
ReplyDeleteBird’s numbers are combined from AA, AAA and the majors.
DeleteBird is filling the hole Texiera left on the perennial DL.
ReplyDelete